John Stossel Speaks To True Journalism, Healthcare, and Limited Government

John Stossel has for years fearlessly demonstrated his honest Journalism. What was there to fear? After all, his crusading spirit on behalf of the consumer and against fraud and corruption is what the public had come to expect and value from him, and naturally that’s what ABC would want therefore to keep delivering to the public to compete for ratings … right? … right?? So … why the switch from ABC to Fox news? Did ABC fire him in August because of his effective opinion report in July that was critical of Obama’s healthcare reform pushing the government-run public option?

Do they really think that the T.V. viewing public will never catch on?

Reposted from: | November 4th, 2009

The Double Standard About Journos’ Bias

By John Stossel

I made The New York Times last week.  It even ran my picture. My mother would be proud.

Unfortunately, the story was critical.  It said, “Critics have leaped on Mr. Stossel’s speaking engagements as the latest evidence of conservative bias on the part of Fox.”

Which “critics” had “leaped”?  The reporter mentioned Rachel Maddow.  I wouldn’t think her criticism newsworthy, but Times reporters may use MSNBC as their guide to life.  He also quoted an “associate professor of journalism” who said my speeches were “‘pretty shameful’ by traditional journalistic standards.”  All this because I spoke at an event for Americans for Prosperity (AFP), a “conservative advocacy group.”

It is odd that this is a news story.  In August, AFP hired me to do the very same thing. I give the money to charity.  The Times didn’t call that “shameful.”

But in August, I worked for ABC News.  Now, I work for Fox.  Hmmm.

It reminds me of something that happened earlier in my career.

I was one of America’s first TV consumer reporters.  I approached the job with an attitude.  If companies ripped people off, I would embarrass them on TV — and demand that government do something. (I now regret the latter — the former was a good thing.)

I clearly had a point of view:  I was a crusader out to punish corporate bullies.  My colleagues liked it.  I got job offers.  I won 19 Emmys.  I was invited to speak at journalism conferences.

Then, gradually, I figured out that business, for the most part, treats consumers pretty well.  The way to get rich in business is to create something good, sell it for a reasonable price, acquire a reputation for honesty and keep pleasing customers so they come back for more.

As a local TV reporter, I could find plenty of crooks.  But once I got to the national stage — “20/20” and “Good Morning America” — it was hard to find comparable national scams.  There were some:  Enron, Bernie Madoff, etc.  But they are rare.  In a $14 trillion economy, you’d think there’d be more.  But there aren’t.

I figured out why:  Market forces, even when hampered by government, keep scammers in check.  Reputation matters.  Word gets out.  Good companies thrive, and bad ones atrophy.  Regulation barely deters the cheaters, but competition does.

It made me want to learn more about free markets.  I subscribed to Reason magazine and read Cato Institute research papers.  Then Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek and Aaron Wildavsky.

My reporting changed.  I started taking skeptical looks at government — especially regulation.  I did an ABC TV special, “Are We Scaring You to Death?” that said we TV reporters often make hysterical claims about chemicals, pollution and other relatively minor risks.  Its good ratings — 16 million viewers — surprised my colleagues.

Suddenly, I wasn’t so popular with them.

I stopped winning Emmys.

I was invited on CNN’s media program, “Reliable Sources,” to be interviewed by The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz and an indignant Bernard Kalb.  They titled the segment, “Objectivity and Journalism:  Does John Stossel Practice Either?”  It was in big letters over my head.

Apparently, I had broken the rules.

On the air they told me that I was no longer objective.  I was too stunned to defend myself effectively.  I said something like:  “I’ve always had a point of view.  How come you had no trouble with that when I criticized business?”

In hindsight, I wish I’d said:  “Look at the title on the wall, you hypocrites!  It shows you have a point of view, too.  Many reporters do.  You just don’t like my arguments now that I no longer hew to your statist line.  So you want to shut me up.”

But I didn’t.

So I’ll say it now:  Reporters who think coercive government control is generally good and I, who thinks voluntary market forces are generally better, both have a point of view.

So why am I the one called biased?

like what “Americans for Prosperity” defends.  I’m an American, and I’m for prosperity.  What creates prosperity is free and competitive markets.  That means limited government.

And I will speak about that every chance I get.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

So … did ABC fire John Stossel in August because of this exercise in honest journalism in July?



This entry was posted in Civil Liberties and Rights, Controlled Mainstream Media and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.